
12:00 PM PDT | 03:00 PM EDT
Overview:
This session walks through a connected workflow: using NotebookLM to upload and organize source material into interactive notebooks complete with summaries, FAQs, and audio overviews, then bringing that output into Claude to develop insights, run cross-comparisons, test hypotheses, and build artifacts like comparison matrices.
The approach is geared toward US academic and professional research contexts literature reviews, policy briefs, and similar work with a strong emphasis on verification and proper source attribution throughout.
Why should you Attend:
If you're buried in disorganized notes and AI-generated summaries you can't fully trust, while others around you are producing tightly sourced, defensible research briefs, this session addresses that gap directly. As 2026 funding increasingly favors data-rigorous proposals, and familiarity with tools like these becomes an expected baseline in hiring, relying on manual, solo research methods carries real risk flawed insights, weaker grant outcomes, and slower progress in an increasingly source-heavy research landscape.
Areas Covered in the Session:
Speaker Profile